The D-Side is an opinion column which allows the writers and fans of Modern Vinyl to give their thoughts on various vinyl-related events. If you have a passionate opinion that you’d like to share with others, either leave it in the comments or send us what you’d like to write about, at modernvinylnews@gmail.com.
This week’s article was submitted by Devin Passariello, drummer for the band This Condition
I would hardly consider myself a vinyl connoisseur. If you’re looking for advice from one, then you might as well stop reading this right now. But I do feel qualified enough to hand out some friendly advice. So if you’re interested in some, then keep reading.
On an almost daily basis, mostly on tumblr, I see people asking for help in choosing a turntable. Whether they were given a record, found one, or went out and bought one; they now have this record with no means to play it. What inspired this post however, are the people who respond and tell them to pick up a Crosley turntable. Especially those who make it a point to mention “how awesome they sound.” Everything about their advice is misleading, and essentially false. Hopefully I can shed some light on the dilemma and point people in the right direction of getting the most out of the records they’re dropping precious dollars on.
Albums will always sound better pressed on vinyl. This is not a matter of opinion. This is a matter of fact. There is a warmth and quality that you can only experience through the vinyl format. It cannot be captured on a CD, or a digital download. So if you’re going to invest in something like a Crosley turntable, then you might as well not invest at all. There are multiple reasons. Here are a few:
1) It is IMPOSSIBLE for your albums to sound good being played through a turntable’s built-in speakers. Again, this is fact, not opinion. The speakers are incredibly small and low powered. Why would you spend money on something that will essentially just ruin the quality of the experience you hope to have?
2) Even if you connect these types of turntables to a sound system, they still sound terrible. Not bad; terrible. The reason is because these Crosley turntables use ceramic cartridges (the mechanism that converts the vibrations of the needle sliding across the grooves of the record into sound), which weigh way more than your average magnetic cartridge. Because of this, the turntable doesn’t need a preamp. The preamp is what amplifies the sound of your turntable going into your sound system. With a good turntable, a preamp is needed because the weight of the cartridge is less, meaning the sound it’s converting will be at a lower volume. The more the cartridge weighs, the louder the sound it produces will be. However, it still won’t sound nearly as good as a turntable that needs a preamp will. Also, the weight of the cartridge leads to the next reason to not buy a Crosley…
3) IT WILL DESTROY YOUR RECORDS! A heavier cartridge means more weight is pressing down on the needle dragging across your record. You’re spending money on a piece of equipment that will destroy something else you spent money on. Seems pretty ridiculous to me that somebody would do such a thing.
There are two types of people who own Crosley turntables: those who wanted a great experience but didn’t know any better, and those who want to sound cool by saying they listen to vinyl. It’s very evident that the Crosley company is cashing in on the idea that vinyl is cool; giving their turntables a “vintage” look, with analog knobs and “wood” finishes. And yes, I quoted wood because it’s not actually a wood finish. It’s a wood finish decal placed on a turntable made out of plastic. A good rule of thumb would be that if you can hold a turntable with one hand, it’s a piece of junk. They should be heavy, and certainly not made out of plastic.
Now, I’m not here to pass judgement. If you built up a collection because of how you think it will make you look, or because you want to say you own a bunch of vinyl and feel more superior than the average music listener, then that’s your prerogative and it has no affect on me. However, if you are one of those people, please do not give advice to somebody who is trying to really appreciate the quality of the record they just bought. The vinyl experience is exactly that: an experience. And the only thing a Crosley turntable will do is completely destroy that experience.
A common problem most people who just started getting into vinyl have is that they don’t realize how expensive of a hobby it is. They also don’t know what it takes to actually listen to your records. Your listening station setup should look like this:
turntable—->preamp—->amplifier—->speakers (or headphones if you don’t have speakers yet)
Turntables, sound systems, even the records themselves, are not cheap. But if you really want to enjoy your album collection, you’re going to need to spend some dollars. However, there are companies that offer quality turntables for not much more than the cost of a Crosley. Audio Technica, Numark, and Pioneer all offer great turntables for less than $220. For those who have a bunch of money to spend, Technics offers really fantastic products. Just prepare to shell out some major bucks.
Hopefully you took something from what I’ve just written. All I wanted to do was give those who may have had some questions a few answers. But if there’s one thing I hope you can take away from this, it’s to never, ever, give any of your money to the Crosley company.
Happy listening,
-d
You can check out Devin’s Tumbler, here.



[...] post: Modern Vinyl – Thе D-Side: Jυѕt ѕау nο tο Crosley Posted: 07 Mar, 2012 | No Comments Categories: Hi Fi Seperates | Tags: | By: [...]
Your definitions of “fact” and “opinion” seem to be pretty fast and loose.
A record will only sound good if properly mastered and manufactured, and even then a properly engineered CD may still sound “better”, so don’t be one of those people who assume vinyl is the end-all-be-all. There are good-sounding records and bad-sounding records, just like there are good-sounding and bad-sounding CDs.
Also, your explanation of the disadvantages of ceramic cartridges is weak at best. Their weight is an issue because it introduces additional noise and distortion to the signal and the piezoelectric amplification is less accurate than a proper preamp used with a magnetic cartridge. You didn’t even bother to mention that the needles used by Crosley are almost universally spherical, which reduces the surface area in contact with the groove of the record versus an elliptical stylus. This increases wear on the groove and reduces playback accuracy.
Next, sure, Crosley’s built-in speakers won’t sound as good as some proper hi-fi speakers, but lots of people listen to most of their music through laptop speakers or Apple earbuds, so who’s to say it will RUIN their experience? The speakers in their Crosley may well sound better than what they’re used to! The fact alone that there are better options out there does not mean that something will ruin your life.
Finally, speaking of better options, I wouldn’t go around calling AT, Numark or Pioneer turntables below $220 “great” or touting them as a definitive vinyl-listening experience. All of them are also made of varying amounts of plastic, utilize cheap, poor-sounding built-in preamplifiers, and come equipped with the same spherical needles that will wear out your records on your Crosley. They may be fine if you’re trying to stick to a budget, but I wouldn’t recommend them over a Crosley any more than I would recommend buying a $1000 turntable over one of them. Plus, if you go that route, you still need a receiver and speakers, which are even more expensive.
I understand the point of this article. Crosleys are shit compared to serious hi-fi gear. Unfortunately, your analysis is lacking and you give some bad advice for people who just want to play those thrift store records they found so they can see what the hype is about. As people get into the hobby, if they decide they want to spend more money to have a better experience, they can upgrade their components. Until then, a Crosley is what it is and might be the easiest way for a future vinyl junkie to get into the hobby, so you might as well let them…
Damn Ralph, way to set the record straight. Kudos.
I own an automatic AT. Use it with computer speakers (rather expensive logitech ones) my little sister owns a Crowley.never knew they used the same kinda needle. Tho it’s obvious my set up sounds better, I also spent almost 4 times what she did. We got it for her for Christmas and listens to records daily, almost more than I do. I was surprised to hear the table bashed so hard, it really sounds great and does the job well. Also cost about 50 bucks. I regulary check on her records bc I’ve given her a few rather expensive pieces and really have no sign of real wear, much less damage. The arm is actually lighter than the one on my AT so I’ll have to keep up with my records to see if mine will get bad. Only time will tell. But honesty until then I have to disagree bc it really sounds great for the price, all it really needs is a slipmat. hopefully she won’t read this article bc it could very well scare her from spinning her favorite records in fear of ruining them.
I hear what ralph is saying but Crosley seriously blows. Its completely fake shit, i know most people don’t want to drop $$$ on their first record player so sometime it makes sense. i know my first record player was worse than a crossly and know my copy of dog problems is paying the price. I dropped a lot on the current set up and i haven’t looked back.
Sorry if comments are slightly delayed guys, they will show up. And once I approve one of your comments I won’t have to approve others
I bought mine from a former DJ who now refurbishes and sells stereo equipment. I got a Technics for $50.